<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A review of idea and innovation software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/</link>
	<description>A blog on prediction markets and innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:22:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jedc_mercury</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>jedc_mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jeffrey.  Will definitely take a look at it and include it in an updated post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jeffrey.  Will definitely take a look at it and include it in an updated post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedc_mercury</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>jedc_mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jeffrey.  Will definitely take a look at it and include it in an updated post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jeffrey.  Will definitely take a look at it and include it in an updated post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Baumgartner</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Baumgartner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at Jenni innovation process management? Details at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jpb.com/jenni/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jpb.com/jenni/index.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&#039;d be happy to arrange a demo for you...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeffrey Baumgartner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at Jenni innovation process management? Details at <a href="http://www.jpb.com/jenni/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.jpb.com/jenni/index.php</a></p>
<p>We&#39;d be happy to arrange a demo for you&#8230;</p>
<p>Jeffrey Baumgartner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedc_mercury</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>jedc_mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Hutch.  I appreciate the additional info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Hutch.  I appreciate the additional info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutch Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Hutch Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Hi Jed -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for including Spigit in your write-up. You&#039;re right - we are seeing great uptake by enterprise customers. Managing the multiple sources of ideas, and filtering for those that are most useful, is an *idea* that is taking root in the corporate world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You raise some good questions about us, and I&#039;ll answer them here. First, in terms of complexity vs simplicity. The platform is actually quite easy for employees, customers and partners to use. It leverages some of the best practices one finds for social software: votes, tags, discussion forums, clickable reviews, wikis, blogs. We also provide a market for users to buy and sell ideas. Any or all of these are available for use when deployed, internally or externally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We put a premium on a superior user experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The analytics engine and enterprise workflow of the platform is why companies are signing up for Spigit. Simple popularity contests for ideas do give a single metric - number of votes. Certainly that is a form of simplicity. But it&#039;s doesn&#039;t come close to mapping to the way innovation really works inside corporations. Spigit has designed-in functionality that reflects the different influence users have in advancing an idea forward.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spigit&#039;s platform has enterprise workflow built-in. Role-based reviews and approvals, quantifiable criteria to advance through stages, and high configurability to adapt to each company&#039;s specific processes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy to tell you more about what Spigit is up to. Please drop us a note at &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:info@spigit.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;info@spigit.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hutch Carpenter&lt;br&gt;Director of Marketing&lt;br&gt;Spigit, Inc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://spigit.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://spigit.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jed -</p>
<p>Thanks for including Spigit in your write-up. You&#39;re right &#8211; we are seeing great uptake by enterprise customers. Managing the multiple sources of ideas, and filtering for those that are most useful, is an *idea* that is taking root in the corporate world.</p>
<p>You raise some good questions about us, and I&#39;ll answer them here. First, in terms of complexity vs simplicity. The platform is actually quite easy for employees, customers and partners to use. It leverages some of the best practices one finds for social software: votes, tags, discussion forums, clickable reviews, wikis, blogs. We also provide a market for users to buy and sell ideas. Any or all of these are available for use when deployed, internally or externally.</p>
<p>We put a premium on a superior user experience.</p>
<p>The analytics engine and enterprise workflow of the platform is why companies are signing up for Spigit. Simple popularity contests for ideas do give a single metric &#8211; number of votes. Certainly that is a form of simplicity. But it&#39;s doesn&#39;t come close to mapping to the way innovation really works inside corporations. Spigit has designed-in functionality that reflects the different influence users have in advancing an idea forward.</p>
<p>Spigit&#39;s platform has enterprise workflow built-in. Role-based reviews and approvals, quantifiable criteria to advance through stages, and high configurability to adapt to each company&#39;s specific processes.</p>
<p>Happy to tell you more about what Spigit is up to. Please drop us a note at <a href="mailto:info@spigit.com" rel="nofollow">info@spigit.com</a>.</p>
<p>Hutch Carpenter<br />Director of Marketing<br />Spigit, Inc.<br /><a href="http://spigit.com" rel="nofollow">http://spigit.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedc_mercury</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>jedc_mercury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jenny.  Thanks for commenting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to be honest; based on my understanding of Qualcomm&#039;s use of prediction markets, I&#039;m really skeptical of how they&#039;re used.  I understand that they&#039;re using PM&#039;s to rank new product/service ideas, which I think is an inappropriate use of PM&#039;s.  What tends to happen is that people trade/buy those ideas that they think _other_ people will buy, and not necessarily the best ideas.  I believe that doing so may find good ideas, but they&#039;ll be conventional ideas.  The ground-breaking ideas won&#039;t get noticed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, if they feel it works for them, that&#039;s fine.  But I think there are other tools that are better suited for innovation.  I&#039;m doing a fair bit of work on this now, and hope to be able to talk about it more widely later this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jenny.  Thanks for commenting.</p>
<p>I have to be honest; based on my understanding of Qualcomm&#39;s use of prediction markets, I&#39;m really skeptical of how they&#39;re used.  I understand that they&#39;re using PM&#39;s to rank new product/service ideas, which I think is an inappropriate use of PM&#39;s.  What tends to happen is that people trade/buy those ideas that they think _other_ people will buy, and not necessarily the best ideas.  I believe that doing so may find good ideas, but they&#39;ll be conventional ideas.  The ground-breaking ideas won&#39;t get noticed.</p>
<p>That said, if they feel it works for them, that&#39;s fine.  But I think there are other tools that are better suited for innovation.  I&#39;m doing a fair bit of work on this now, and hope to be able to talk about it more widely later this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Ambrozek</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Ambrozek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Jed,. Good to see you continuing to push thinking about  predction markets, collective intelligence and innovation forward. You might be interested in a piece a colleague and I wrote last year for Inside Knowledge Magazine: &lt;a href=&quot;http://snurl.com/cmzd5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://snurl.com/cmzd5&lt;/a&gt;  For me, Carlos dos Santos&quot; use of prediction markets at Qualcomm remains the most evolved and intelligent PM application. His integration of the technology into a thoughtful organizational structure promising the opportuity to present a new product business plan to the C-suite is inspired.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Separately there are some folks to whom I would like to introduce you.  Can we please connect via email?  I look forward to catching up.  If you are on Twitter please share your user name. I&#039;m &quot;sagenet&quot;.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jed,. Good to see you continuing to push thinking about  predction markets, collective intelligence and innovation forward. You might be interested in a piece a colleague and I wrote last year for Inside Knowledge Magazine: <a href="http://snurl.com/cmzd5" rel="nofollow">http://snurl.com/cmzd5</a>  For me, Carlos dos Santos&#8221; use of prediction markets at Qualcomm remains the most evolved and intelligent PM application. His integration of the technology into a thoughtful organizational structure promising the opportuity to present a new product business plan to the C-suite is inspired.</p>
<p>Separately there are some folks to whom I would like to introduce you.  Can we please connect via email?  I look forward to catching up.  If you are on Twitter please share your user name. I&#39;m &#8220;sagenet&#8221;.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review Of Idea and Innovation Software &#171; Steps &#38; Leaps</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Review Of Idea and Innovation Software &#171; Steps &#38; Leaps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>[...] recent mini-review here of 19 software tools for capturing, evaluating, marketing and selling ideas for product or service [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent mini-review here of 19 software tools for capturing, evaluating, marketing and selling ideas for product or service [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knowtu &#187; links for 2009-01-30</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowtu &#187; links for 2009-01-30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>[...] Mercury’s Blog » Blog Archive » A review of idea and innovation software (tags: innovation) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mercury’s Blog » Blog Archive » A review of idea and innovation software (tags: innovation) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottberkun.com &#187; Wednesday linkfest</title>
		<link>http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/10/10/a-review-of-idea-and-innovation-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>scottberkun.com &#187; Wednesday linkfest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mercury-rac.com/?p=99#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>[...] Review of idea generation / innovation management software. It&#8217;s more of a listing than a review, but it&#8217;s the closest thing I&#8217;ve found. I get asked about this all the time - anyone know of a better comparative review of these kinds of &#8220;creativity support&#8221; tools? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review of idea generation / innovation management software. It&#8217;s more of a listing than a review, but it&#8217;s the closest thing I&#8217;ve found. I get asked about this all the time &#8211; anyone know of a better comparative review of these kinds of &#8220;creativity support&#8221; tools? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
